返回全部
Nat. Clim. Chang.2026Article

土地密集型二氧化碳移除对生物多样性的影响

Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal

Ruben Prütz · Joeri Rogelj · Gaurav Ganti · Jeff Price · Rachel Warren · Nicole Forstenhäusler · Yazhen Wu · Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik · Michael Wögerer · Tamás Krisztin · Petr Havlík · Florian Kraxner · Stefan Frank · Tomoko Hasegawa · Jonathan C. Doelman · Vassilis Daioglou · Florian Humpenöder · Alexander Popp · Sabine Fuss

1. 信息

DOI10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5

期刊Nature Climate Change / Nat. Clim. Chang.

类型Article

发表2026-01-30 (online)

卷期页16(2): 155-163

收录2026-10-03

被浏览…

关键词carbon dioxide removalbiodiversity impactsforestationbioenergy with carbon capture and storagebiodiversity hotspotsland use change1.5 °C warming targetclimate change mitigation scenariosbiodiversity conservation

标签—

2. 摘要

与全球气候目标一致的路径通常采用森林经营和碳捕获与封存相结合的生物能源等土地密集型方法,移除数十亿吨的二氧化碳移除(CDR)。这种大规模的土地密集型 CDR 部署可能对生物多样性产生负面影响。在此,我们评估了五个综合评估模型中的情景,并表明,与将变暖限制在 1.5℃以内的目标一致的情景,将高达 13%的全球高生物多样性重要区域用于土地密集型 CDR。这些重叠分布不均,低收入和中等收入国家占比较高。理解气候行动与生物多样性保护之间的潜在冲突至关重要。一个说明性分析表明,如果当前生物多样性热点地区免受土地利用变化的影响,在评估情景中,超过一半用于森林经营和碳捕获与封存的土地将无法使用,除非利用气候与保护目标之间的协同效应。我们的分析还表明,由于避免了变暖,CDR 相关的生物多样性效益。

原文摘要(English)

Pathways consistent with global climate objectives typically deploy billions of tonnes of carbon dioxide removal (CDR) from land-intensive methods such as forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage. Such large-scale deployment of land-intensive CDR may have negative consequences for biodiversity. Here we assess scenarios across five integrated assessment models and show that scenarios consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C allocate up to 13% of global areas of high biodiversity importance for land-intensive CDR. These overlaps are distributed unevenly, with higher shares in low- and middle-income countries. Understanding the potential conflicts between climate action and biodiversity conservation is crucial. An illustrative analysis shows that if current biodiversity hotspots were protected from land-use change, over half the land allocated for forestation and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage in the assessed scenarios would be unavailable unless synergies between climate and conservation goals are leveraged. Our analysis also indicates CDR-related biodiversity benefits due to avoided warming.

3. 图表

文章图表 / 封面图

4. 引用

Prütz R, Rogelj J, Ganti G, et al. Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal[J]. Nature Climate Change, 2026, 16(2): 155-163. DOI: 10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5.
查看 BibTeX
@article{prtz2026,
  author = {Ruben Prütz and Joeri Rogelj and Gaurav Ganti and Jeff Price and Rachel Warren and Nicole Forstenhäusler and Yazhen Wu and Andrey Lessa Derci Augustynczik and Michael Wögerer and Tamás Krisztin and Petr Havlík and Florian Kraxner and Stefan Frank and Tomoko Hasegawa and Jonathan C. Doelman and Vassilis Daioglou and Florian Humpenöder and Alexander Popp and Sabine Fuss},
  title = {Biodiversity implications of land-intensive carbon dioxide removal},
  journal = {Nature Climate Change},
  year = {2026},
  volume = {16},
  number = {2},
  pages = {155-163},
  doi = {10.1038/s41558-026-02557-5},
  publisher = {Springer Science and Business Media LLC},
}

· END ·